Artificial turf calculator
Infill is most of the weight of this job and the published rates for it do not follow from pile height, whatever the volume formula says. Enter your lawn and this gives you the infill against its published band, plus the turf both ways round.
Infill: the rate is a product measurement, not a calculation
Infill is most of the weight of this job, and the tempting way to get it is by working out a volume: take the pile height, halve it, call that the infill depth, multiply by area, multiply by a density. That method is even written down by one of the suppliers.
It disagrees with that same supplier's own published rates, and you can see it without knowing any densities. The Motz Group's infill guide states the method as "divide the pile height of the turf by two ... to get the number of required cubic feet". For a 1-3/4 in pile that is an infill depth of 0.875 in. The table on the same page, in the row for that very pile height, gives the depth as 1/2 to 3/4 in. The method overshoots the table before a density is even applied — and once one is, the published pound figures come out roughly twice what the rate table says.
So this page does not calculate the rate. It asks for it, and shows you the published band for your pile so you can check what you typed:
| Pile height | Coated sand (Envirofill) | Walnut shell (Safeshell) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 – 1-1/4 in, pet & playground | 1.5 – 2.5 lb/sq ft | 0.75 – 1.25 |
| 1-1/2 – 1-3/4 in, landscape | 2.5 – 3.5 | 1.25 – 1.75 |
| 1-7/8 – 2-1/4 in, landscape | 3.5 – 4.5 | 1.75 – 2.25 |
| 1 – 1-1/4 in putting green, top dressed | 0.25 – 0.5 | — |
Two things in that table are worth more than the numbers. First, walnut shell weighs about half what coated sand does over the same pile — so the rate is a property of the product in the bag, not of the turf. Second, a top-dressed putting green takes a twentieth of what the same pile height takes as a playground. Neither of those can be recovered from a depth formula, which is exactly why the formula is the wrong tool.
The gap between the two approaches does not need a density to see. For a 1-3/4 in pile the halve-the-pile method starts from an infill depth of 0.875 in against the table's own 1/2 to 3/4 in — so it is running 1.2 to 1.75 times high before anyone picks a density, and picking one only compounds it. Start from the rate instead and the density never enters the sum.
One figure that is not in dispute and is worth having: installation loss is "less than 1% if installed properly". Infill waste is not what inflates this job.
Why this page prints more than one product's rate. It has nothing to sell you. The table above sets one manufacturer's coated sand against that same manufacturer's walnut-shell infill, and both against a second published source for the same material — and it prints the spread rather than resolving it, because the spread is the finding. If the bag in your driveway carries a rate, that is the number to use. What this page can add is how far the published figures sit from one another before you pick one.
Where these numbers come from, and what they do not cover. Both sources here are Motz-affiliated — the rate table and the Envirofill installation guidelines are two views of one supply chain, not two independent manufacturers, and we could not obtain published rates from anyone else. Figures circulating for raw silica sand appear only in installer blog posts rather than in any published specification, so none is given here. Crumb rubber, zeolite and cork we could not source at all, and they are not covered. If your bag carries a rate, it beats everything on this page.
What the published band can and cannot tell you
The band shown beside the answer is a lookup, not a calculation, and three things about it are worth knowing before you check your rate against it.
- Pile height alone does not identify a rate. Look again at the table: a 1 to 1-1/4 in pile takes 1.5 – 2.5 lb/sq ft as a pet or playground surface and 0.25 – 0.5 top-dressed as a putting green. That is a twentieth of the material at the same blade length. The lookup keys on the pile height only, so on a putting green it will show you the playground band. The infill total is unaffected — it uses the rate you typed, which is the reason the rate is an input.
- The edges between the bands are ours, not the supplier's. The published rows are 1 to 1-1/4, 1-1/2 to 1-3/4 and 1-7/8 to 2-1/4 in, and nothing is published for the gaps in between them. A 1-3/8 in pile sits in one of those gaps, so the lookup splits each gap at its midpoint: at 1-3/8 in you are still shown the band below, and a hair above it you are shown the band above. That split is a convention chosen to avoid inventing a rate, not a figure anyone published.
- Outside 1 to 2-1/4 in the two rate outputs go blank. That is where the published table starts and stops, and an extrapolated band would look exactly like a sourced one on the page. Below a 1 in pile and above a 2-1/4 in one there is nothing to check your rate against, so the page shows nothing rather than a number it cannot stand behind. The infill total still comes out, because it is your rate that drives it.
And the direction you roll it is worth 300 square feet
Turf is a roll of fixed width. You cannot buy 8 ft of a 15 ft roll — you buy the full width and cut. So a lawn has exactly two answers, and they are not close.
Take a 20 × 30 ft yard and a 15 ft roll:
- Run the strips 20 ft long, two of them across the 30 ft side: 40 linear ft, so 15 × 40 = 600 sq ft. The lawn is 600 sq ft. Nothing left over.
- Run them 30 ft long, two across the 20 ft side: 60 linear ft, so 15 × 60 = 900 sq ft — and 300 sq ft of it goes in the skip.
Same lawn, same roll, 50% more turf for turning the drawing sideways. The rule is short enough to check by hand:
buy = W × min( B × ceil(A ÷ W), A × ceil(B ÷ W) )
Two other things fall out of it that a square-foot total will not tell you. Order in linear feet — the counter sells 15 ft × n ft, and asking for "600 square feet" gets you a blank look. And count the seams: strips minus one. Each is jointing tape and adhesive, and each is a line you will see across the lawn for as long as you own it, so it is worth choosing which direction it runs in as well as how many there are.
Roll width is one supplier's standard, not a fact
Two product sheets, two widths:
- Greatmats "La Jolla" — "standard width of 15 feet", full roll "100 linear feet", 1,500 sq ft, sold by the square foot, "available in custom cut lengths".
- USA Turf Pros "USA Grand Slam" — "12 Feet Wide", stocked in 25, 35, 55 and 75 ft lengths, sold by linear footage.
So fifteen feet is not a standard the way a 4 × 8 sheet is, and the width is a field above rather than baked in. On a 13 × 20 ft lawn the difference is not academic: at 12 ft you buy 312 sq ft laid one way and 480 laid the other, and at 15 ft the whole 13 ft width comes off a single strip.
Notice the second difference in that pair, because it will trip you at the counter: one is priced by the square foot and the other by the linear foot. They are not interchangeable numbers — 40 linear feet of a 15 ft roll is 600 square feet — and below a full roll you are buying a cut length, whose price per square foot may not match the full-roll price. Ask before you compare quotes.
What this does not size
Base depth, seam tape and stakes. We could not find published installation figures for any of the three, and would rather leave them out than invent them. Your turf supplier's own installation sheet is the place to get them, and it will be specific to their backing and your soil.
Questions people ask
How much artificial turf do I need for a 20 x 30 ft yard?
How much infill do I need per square foot?
Why does the direction of the rolls change how much I buy?
Do I need infill at all?
How many seams will I have?
Last reviewed